C sounds most correct.
please vote my answer branliest! Thanks.
Answer:
Amount of money invested is $2,000 and $4,000
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to calculate how much was invested in two different accounts given the amount of money invested in both accounts.
Let the amount of money invested in both accounts be a and b respectively.
Mathematically;
A + B = 6000 ......I
Now we use the formula for simple interest to check the amount that is supposed to be made on Both accounts if he end of a year.
Formula for simple interest is I = PRT/100
Let’s apply this to what is on ground:
5*1* a/100 = 5a/100
Second is
9*b*1/100 = 9b/100
That is 5a + 9b = 38,000. ........ii
Solving Both simultaneously as follows:
Let A = 6000-b from 1
Substitute this into 2
5(6000-b) + 9b = 38,000
30,000 -5b + 9b = 38,000
4b = 8,000
b =$2000
This means a would be 6000 - 2,000 = $4000
Answer:
F. Both firms have a dominant strategy to pick the Low Price option
Explanation:
In the given case as we can see that in the yellow form there is always a greater payoff by having a lesser price so it can be said that it set a less price
Now for the blue firm it also select the lesser price
So here the nash equilibrium would be
= (Low price, low price)
= (26,20)
The first payoff would be considered as a yellow firm and the other one is blue one
Therefore the last option is correct
Explanation:
When I think about the term marketing mix, I think about a set of tools that firms use to increase their profits such as price, product, promotion and place.