1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
photoshop1234 [79]
3 years ago
5

$650 is invested in an account at 3% simple interest per year. Write an explicit formula representing the account balance in any

given year, and use this formula to find the balance in the 25th year.
Mathematics
1 answer:
mixer [17]3 years ago
5 0
The correct answer is 1,950
You might be interested in
In the diagram, the radius of the outer circle is 2x cm and the radius of the inside circle is 6 cm. The area of the shaded regi
Greeley [361]

Answer:

its 7

Step-by-step explanation:

I just took the test and got 3 wrong and it said it was 7 so there u go

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write 3.3.3. 3 in exponential form.
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

That is 3 to the 4th power

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which answer represents the expression in its expanded form?
Luden [163]
The answer is 6x^2-2x-20
5 0
3 years ago
Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.
Jobisdone [24]
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Can someone please answer this ‍♀️
Marianna [84]
A) JL and JK

Because you must always start from top to bottom and left to right.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Graph the logarithmic function y=log(x-4) please show work
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose that a large mixing tank initially holds 300 gallons of water is which 50 pounds of salt have been dissolved. Another br
    15·1 answer
  • Derek is solving the following equation. Find where he made a mistake.
    7·2 answers
  • Eric has two number cubes each labeled 1 to 6. Eric is going to conduct an experiment by tossing the cubes a total of 180 times.
    8·1 answer
  • The braking distance Dv (in meters) for a certain car moving at velocity v (in meters/second) is given by =Dvv234.
    12·1 answer
  • Find (2 × 104) − (3 × 103).
    15·2 answers
  • Jimmy is riding his bike at a speed of 5.5m/s. how long will it take him to go 2 miles?
    8·1 answer
  • The equation through the point (5,3) and is parallel the equation y=2/5x+7​
    14·1 answer
  • Find the slope of the line passing through (-9,3), (-3,-5)
    10·1 answer
  • Do you know this??<br> I’m confused
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!