Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
C Each person is free to believe as he or she wishes in religious matters
Answer:
just search it up. is it a worksheet that someone else made other than your teacher?
Explanation:
I literally can’t understand you rewrite the question
It was originally going to help fix the Articles of Confederation, but instead it ended up creating a new plan for government called the Constitution.
