You can distinguish between correlation and causation and eliminate confounding variables by using random assignment. Experiments often create contrasts between a control group and one or more treatment groups as a crucial part of the scientific method.
<h3>When is random assignment appropriate in an experiment?</h3>
In general, whenever it is ethically feasible and appropriate for your research topic, random assignment should always be used in trials. Both random sampling and random assignment are crucial ideas in research, but it's critical to recognize their distinctions.
<h3>Is it moral to choose participants for an experiment at random?</h3>
Random assignment cannot be used to evaluate risky or unhealthy behaviour. For instance, it would be unethical to assign volunteers at random to one of the two groups and urge them to consume huge amounts of alcohol as part of an experiment on heavy drinkers versus social drinkers.
Learn more about Completely randomized design:
brainly.com/question/20595336
#SPJ4
<span>D. South Carolinians saw Abraham Lincoln as a threat to the institution of slavery. That should be the answer. Hope I helped!</span>
You're talking about the medical model.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not include answers, we can say the following.
Tori is studying for her Introduction to Philosophy course and wants to create a mind map to help her remember the classical Greek philosophers and their basic philosophical principles. What Tori should do when she sits down to draw her mind map is "Write her main idea in the center of the page, and then add major categories that branch out from the center."
That is the best way to proceed if you want to draw her mind map. For that to happen, Tori has to go look at the best information available for the map. So Tori has to collect information from primary or secondary resources and try to edit the main ideas that fit in Tori's concept of a mind map.
