Answer:
Systematic error
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming that none of the judges are biased, the most likely reason for this difference is the occurrence of systematic errors.
Systematic errors are errors introduced by inaccuracy in the experimental design, be it in the observation or measurement process.
In this case, the reaction time from observing the finish and stopping the clock for each judge might be different, which configures a systematic error.
Answer:
The answer to your question is y = 2x + 11
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
Original line y = -(1/2)x + 5
Point (-4, 3)
Process
1.- Get the slope of the new line
- Slope of the original line = -1/2
If the lines are perpendicular, the slopes must be reciprocal
-1/2 reciprocal = 2
2.- Get the equation of the new line
y - y1 = m(x - x1)
y - 3 = 2(x + 4)
- Simplification
y - 3 = 2x + 8
- Solve for y
y = 2x + 8 + 3
y = 2x + 11
It’s eight because 7 can round up so it changed to eight
Answer:
SOLUTION #1
If the digits are allowed to repeat, the answer is 27. (There are three ways to fill digit 1, three ways to fill digit 2, and three ways to fill digit 3. Therefore, there are 3 x 3 x 3 = 27 possibilities.)
SOLUTION #2
If the digits are NOT allowed to repeat, the answer is 6. (There are three ways to fill digit 1, only two ways to fill digit 2, and only one way to fill digit 3. Therefore, there are 3 x 2 x 1 = 6 possibilities.)
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this <em><u>Helped!</u></em> :D
Answer:
The gcf of 15 and 64 can be obtained like this: The factors of 15 are 15, 5, 3, 1. The factors of 64 are 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1. The common factors of 15 and 64 are 1, intersecting the two sets above. In the intersection factors of 15 ∩ factors of 64 the greatest element is 1. Therefore, the greatest common factor of 15 and 64 is 1.
Hope this helped!
Good luck :p
~Emmy <3
