3 years ago

Anthropologist ralph linton said, "the last thing a fish would ever notice would be water." what does this imply about culture

1 answer:

7 0

''The last thing a fish would ever notice would be water'' is a statement that can easily be connected with the humans societies and their culture. With this statement, Linton practically says that the humans, if put on the place of the fish, would notice the last the things that they experience everyday, and which are crucial for their survival, such as the water, food, and air. This implies that the humans would only notice that their environment and basic things for living only when there will large scale problems with it.

You might be interested in

Arrange the following in the sequence in which filtrate moves through them. (1) loop of Henle (2) Bowman's capsule (3) distal co

snow_tiger [21]

Answer: 2; 4 ;1 ; 3

Explanation:

2. Bowman's capsule

4. proximal convoluted tubule

1. loop of Henle

3. distal convoluted tubule

5 0

3 years ago

Which national park is the only one route 66 runs through?.

Stells [14]

Answer:

Petrified Forest National Park

Explanation:

hoped it helped!

7 0

2 years ago

Did admiral yamamoto make a wise decision in bombing

Alekssandra [29.7K]

Yes he make a decision inbombing

6 0

3 years ago

Through a comparable company analysis for Alibaba, you determined a P/E ratio of 6.0x is appropriate to value the company. Based

Anon25 [30]

Seval ozhabes Seval your dad is going to be there for a while and I will be there for a while and I will be

4 0

2 years ago

Another way that children are able to testify in a case is through the use of a closed-circuit television (CCTV). Its use allows

Anna11 [10]

Answer:

need to protect; outweighs

Explanation:

The court gave the permission that in cases that have to do with such criminal offences if the victim is 14 or less than 14 at the time of the offence, and if they were 16 years or less at the time of testimony, the child's testimony has to be gotten through closed-circuit television.

The court decided in this court case that the need for the child to be protected is more than the rights of the defender to confront the accuser.

7 0

3 years ago