Answer:
By increasing the amount of solutes in the intestine, these will increase in the bloodstream, that is, there will be a higher concentration of solutes in the volume.
To compensate for this phenomenon, the brain will coordinate, together with the tongue, the sensation of "dry mouth or thirsty mouth" in order to encourage the individual to consume water.
Once the individual takes the water, it is absorbed at the intestinal level and the general systemic volume increases, thus generating an increase in blood pressure, body hydration and a decrease in the concentration of solutes in the blood.
Explanation:
The renin angiotensin aldosterone system is a system that indirectly regulates the sensation of thirst and blood volume. This system connects the lung, with the cardiovascular system and the kidneys since they all work together.
When a person eats or eats a very salty food, or even drinks very sugary drinks or with salts and minerals, all this is absorbed, and this is how after ingestion thirst is triggered to compensate for the amount of solutes it has a rise in volume.
Answer:
Explanation:
DNA --> mRNA --> amino acid --> protein
This describes the central dogma
I think the answer is true not 100% tho
Answer:
Nucleus
Explanation:
The nucleus is the genetic center of the eukaryotic cell because it contains the genetic material (DNA, RNA) used for the storage of genetic information
Formulating a New Hypothesis
If the initial hypothesis is not supported, you can go back to the drawing board and hypothesize a new answer to the question and a new way to test it. If your hypothesis is supported, you might think of ways to refine your hypothesis and test those.
Failure to support hypotheses is common in science, and often serves as a starting point for new experiments. Go back to the statement of hypothesis in the Introduction. Then review your findings, the data from the experiment. Make a judgment about whether or not the hypothesis has been supported.
It is verified by testing it. If the data supports the hypothesis, then we consider the hypothesis to be verified and true. If however, the data does not support the hypothesis or refutes it, then the hypothesis is in trouble, and we have to come up with a different hypothesis to explain the observations.
Explanation: ... If the data consistently do not support the hypothesis, then CLEARLY, the hypothesis is NOT a reasonable explanation of what you are investigating. The hypothesis is rejected, and we search for a new interpretation, an new hypothesis that supports the experimental data