1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DedPeter [7]
3 years ago
15

ANSWER ASAP GIVING BRAINLIEST AND FIVE STARS!

Mathematics
1 answer:
algol133 years ago
7 0

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

It is not necessary to have a common denominator when multiplying fractions.  To multiply fractions with different denominators, you multiply the numerators with each other and then the denominators with each other. The end product of multiplying fractions with no common denominator may not be in its lowest terms however, and might need to be reduced. For example, if you were to multiply 1/2 by 2/3, you would first multiply the numerators (1 and 2) to get 2, and then the denominators (2 and 3) for a product of 2/6. After getting this product, reduce it to its lowest terms, end up with 1/2 by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 2, and end up with 1/3 as a final product. Thus, it is not necessary to have common denominators when multiplying fractions.

Hope this helped! :)

You might be interested in
A phone company offers two monthly plans. Plan A costs
Rus_ich [418]

For plan A it will only take five minutes to amount to $20.50

Plan B will need 30 min to cost the same as plan A $20.50

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ HELP<br><br> Which statement is an example of the reflexive property of congruence?
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
The answer is C, reflexive property just shows that, for example, A is congruent to A. it proved that a triangle or a line is congruent to itself :)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Simplify 13/20 please please please
olasank [31]
That fraction is fully simplified. :)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which set of ordered pairs does not represent a function?
ser-zykov [4K]

Answer: set 2 : O{(-6, -7), (-3, -3), (-2,-8), (-6,4)}

Step-by-step explanation: In order for a set of ordered pairs to be a function, then each input can correspond to only 1 output. In the context of your question, this means there cannot be two ordered pairs which have the same x value. The second set of ordered pairs does not represent a function because the input x = -6 corresponds to two different outputs, y = -7 and y = 4.

7 0
2 years ago
A family is going on a trip for 3 days tgr total cost for hotel is 336 one hundred dollars a day was budgeted for food how much
Alona [7]
It will cost 212$ a day
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A spinner with nine equal-sized sections numbered one to nine is spun once. What is the probability that the spinner will land o
    13·1 answer
  • I need help with these two equations
    11·1 answer
  • What is the answer a, b, c, or d
    7·1 answer
  • What is 4pi/3 radians in degrees?
    8·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP PLEASE, THANKS! :)
    15·1 answer
  • 49v2 + 42v<br> 56v3<br> Simplify rational expression
    14·1 answer
  • Solve using the quadratic formula.<br> 3x^2+6x+7=0
    7·1 answer
  • What is the volume of a rectangular prism with a length of 14 m, height of 6
    13·2 answers
  • 6 math questions, answer all please for all points
    10·1 answer
  • What areC12, C31, and C22 of matrix C?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!