Answer:
i need to see the graph
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that

So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
The easiest way to do this is to write the decimals with equal amount of places after the dot and you'll see it more clearly:
1.09 = 1.090
1.901 = 1.901
1.9 = 1.900
1.19 = 1.190
So from the least to the greatest:
1.090
1.190
1.900
1.901
In a form you gave at the beginning:
1.09 < 1.19 < 1.9 < 1.901
Answer:
572000
Step-by-step explanation:
The population reduced by 12%, so (100-12)=88% is remaining.
So, 88% of 650000= 0.88 x 650000
= 572000
89kg in stones would be 12.598 stones