Answer:
-13n+21 if i did it properly.
Answer:
a)
Step-by-step explanation:
In a study, if we want to measure of establish a relation between two variables, we say that there is a confounding variable when there is a third variable that is having an effect on our original two variables but this third variable wasn't originally measured in our study. Therefore our results are misleading because the relation between our two variables is being influenced by the confounding one.
This is why the correct answer would be the a) An explanatory variable has a great effect on a response variable. And this causes a misleading interpretation between the two variables.
<h3>Given</h3>
- 5 movies and 2 video games rent for $26
- 3 movies and 8 video games rent for $53
<h3>Find</h3>
<h3>Solution</h3>
Let m and v represent the rental cost of a movie and a video game, respectively. The given information can be expressed in two equations:
... 5m +2v = 26
... 3m +8v = 53
Using Cramer's rule, we can find the solution to be
... m = (2·53 -8·26)/(2·3-8·5) = -102/-34 = 3
... v = (26·3-53·5)/-34 = 5.50
The rental cost for each movie is $3; for each video game is $5.50.
_____
The Vedic math variation of Cramer's Rule tells you the solution to
is ...
- x=(bf-ec)/(bd-ea)
- y=(cd-fa)/(bd-ea)
Assuming his house payment is $468.21
you just add them all together
468.21+1231+1087= $2786.21
then rounded to the nearest dollar
$2786
Since, the number w and 0.8 are additive inverses.
A number 'a' is said to have an additive inverse '-a' if "a+ (-a)= 0".
Since, 'w' and '0.8' are additive inverses of each other such that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e562/8e562ec733c5ab058986b3052e42a872e35afcb6" alt="w + 0.8 = 0"
Therefore, the value of 'w' should be '-0.8' so that
.
So, the value of 'w' is =0.8
Now, Refer to the attached image which represents the position of 0.8 , w ( that is -0.8) and the sum of 0.8 and w.
Sum of 0.8 and w = 0.8 + w
= 0.8 +(-0.8)
= 0.