Answer:
Yes, there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No ;
Step-by-step explanation:
n = 1000
x = 545
Phat = x / n = 545/1000 = 0.545
H0: p ≤ 0.5
H1: μ > 0.5
The test statistic :
(phat - p0) ÷ √(p(1 - P0) / n)
Test statistic :
(0.545 - 0.5) ÷ √(0.5(0.5) / 1000)
0.045 / 0.0158113
Test statistic = 2.846
α = 0.01
Decison :
Reject H0 ; if Pvalue < α
Using the Pvalue from Test statistic (Z) calculator :
Pvalue = 0.002214
With Pvalue < α ; We reject H0 and conclude that there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No, making generalization about all women would not be reasonable as the data employed for the research mainly focuses on a particular
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>✌</em><em />
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Because lot of people love it
Answer:
B. False
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Required
Is the distance between them 
Given that there are two points, the distance between them is calculated using
Distance = 
In this case;
Substitute these in the given formula
Distance = 
Comparing this with the given formula, both are not the same;
Hence, the formula is false and the correct formula is of the form
Answer is B. Becuz (4,096)1/3 equals to 16. And so does (16×16)1/2
