Answer: This is because the marginal rate of technical substitution is the ratio of the marginal product of labour to that of capital and for the output to be constant opportunity cost comes in, one input has to be reduced to increase the other input.
Explanation:
The marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) shows the amount by which the quantity of an input can be lowered when an extra unit of another input is utilized on order for the output to remain constant.
The marginal rate of technical substitution is likely to reduce as more capital is substituted for labor because the marginal rate of technical substitution is the ratio of the marginal product of labour to that of capital and for the output to be constant opportunity cost comes in, one input has to be reduced to increase the other input.
<u>b. Hooking up</u> is the term refers to an affiliate relationship between an accounting/auditing firm and its sponsoring organization in China.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Hooking up is the term refers the affiliate relationship between an accounting/auditing firm and its sponsoring organization.
Auditing Firm is a company which reviews the activities of an organization to identify their inefficiencies and achieve the organizational objectives. Auditing firms can help in investigating the potential theft or fraud and ensure compliance with applicable terms and policies. The reports of the organization can be maintained accurately.
The auditing firm works for their sponsored organization and helps them in achieving their goals.
The amount that that Azco Autosystems, Inc., can afford to spend on an energy management system is $80,744.
<h3>Present value</h3>
Using this formula
Present Value = A(P/A, 10%, 5)
Where:
A=$21,300
(P/A, 10%, 5)=3.79079
Let plug in the formula
Present Value = 21,300 (P/A, 10%,5)
Present Value = 21,300 (3.79079)
Present Value =80,743.8
Present Value = $80,744 (Approximately)
Inconclusion the amount that that Azco Autosystems, Inc., can afford to spend on an energy management system is $80,744.
Learn more about present value here:brainly.com/question/15904086
Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
