Hello,
Looking at the data, you should go with the second and fourth results.
On the second one, Dr. Appiah's M.A.D. is only 9.7 which is less than Dr. Singh's M.A.D. of 14.1
On the fourth one, Dr. Cantwell and Dr. Singh both have a M.A.D. that is only 0.1 from 14, so their ages vary by about the same amount.
Best of luck,
MrEQ
There is actually no one ☝
Using the confidence interval, it is found that the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
<h3>When does a confidence interval for the difference of proportions gives convincing evidence that there is a difference?</h3>
It gives convincing evidence when 0 is not part of the confidence interval.
In this problem, the interval is (0.02, 0.38), which does not contain 0, hence the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
More can be learned about confidence intervals at brainly.com/question/25890103
17. All
18. B because it can be symmetrical either way
