There was no picture, sorry.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
Upward mobility is the movement of an individual from a sociological classification to another better sociological classification. It is evident that dawn sociological life from her early beginning was quite not fancy enough as her parents were the busy type and not the rich type of parent in sociological classification in hierarchy, but evidently now, Dawn recently bought her first home and works as a lawyer, she came from a background that her parent worked soo hard to become who she is now so her sociological life changed from a quite busy sociological life to a life of affordability, what her parents couldnt afford for her, she can possibly afford for her kids now that her sociological life has changes since she became a lawyer.
Answer:
Two hairs from the same head may not have the same morphological characteristics.
Explanation:
The medulla is the hair core that is not always present. ... Hair can best be characterized as originating from an animal be examining..... Both the medulla and cuticle. T/F: Two hairs from the same head may not have the same morphological characteristics.
When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.
One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.
There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including a decline in supervision increased social and academic demands participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want
Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders
brainly.com/question/6258097
#SPJ4
A They joined the U.S Army
