Find class boundaries, midpoint, and width for the class. 57-61

Pls Help !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sedaia [141]

Answer:

30

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Which best represents data that is not likely to be clustered?

AfilCa [17]

Answer: guess it your self

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

A particle is moving along the x-axis so that its position at t ≥ 0 is given by s(t) = (t)In(5t). Find the acceleration of the p

Anika [276]

position = s(t) = (t)In(5t)

velocity = ds/dt = t d/dt (ln (5t)) +d/dt (t) ln (5t)

= t * 5 1/5t + ln (5t)

= 1 + ln (5t)

acceleration = dv/dt = d^2s/dt^2 = d/dt (1 + ln(5t))

=d/dt (1) + d/dt (ln 5t)

= 0 + 1/5t * 5

= 1/t

0 = 1 + ln (5t)

-1 = ln (5t)

e^-1 = 5t

1/e = 5t

1/(5e) =t

acceleration = 1/t = 1/(1/5e) = 5e

Answer: 5e

5 0

3 years ago

Suppose a researcher believes that college students vote at a lower rate than college faculty. She collects data from 200 colleg

Paladinen [302]

Answer:

We conclude that college students vote at a lower rate than college faculty which means researcher’s claim was correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a researcher believes that college students vote at a lower rate than college faculty.

She collects data from 200 college faculty and 200 college students using simple random sampling. If 138 of the students and 167 of the faculty voted in the 2008 Presidential election

Let $p_1$ = proportion of college students who voted in the 2008 Presidential election.

$p_2$ = proportion of college faculty who voted in the 2008 Presidential election.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1-p_2\geq$ 0 or $p_1\geq p_2$ {means that college students vote at a equal or higher rate than college faculty}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1-p_2$ < 0 or $p_1$ {means that college students vote at a lower rate than college faculty}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z proportion statistics;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of college students who voted in the 2008 Presidential election = $\frac{138}{200}$ = 0.69

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of college faculty who voted in the 2008 Presidential election = $\frac{167}{200}$ = 0.835

$n_1$ = sample of college students = 200

$n_2$ = sample of college faculty = 200

So, test statistics = $\frac{(0.69-0.835)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.69(1-0.69)}{200}+\frac{0.835(1-0.835)}{200} } }$

= -3.458

The value of z test statistics is -3.458.

Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistics doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that college students vote at a lower rate than college faculty which means researcher’s claim was correct.

8 0

2 years ago

11%, 1 2 1119 Least to greatest

umka2103 [35]

Answer:

12, 11%, 1119 this is correct

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers