If there is one table (t=1) then 6 chairs (c=6) can be placed around the table, 2 along the length on each side and 1 at each end.
When t=2, and the tables are end to end (joined at their width) c=10, that is, 4 chairs on each side of the double table and 1 at each end. Each time a table is added c increases by 4 so we can write c=4t+2 the constant 2 being the single chair at each end. If the tables are separated then c=6t.
So the first column is if a serving is 36 so all you have to do is divide all the different ingredient amounts by three and that will tell you the answer for the serving of 12 row because 12 * 3 = 36
and for the 24 row just multiply all the numbers you get in the 12 row and that will be the answer cause 12 * 2 = 24
then what ever numbers you get on the 12 serving column just divide those by 12 and that will tell you how much you get for one serving and that will help you solve for the 60 one and the 300 one all you have to do it times the numbers by 60 and then 300
Answer:
0.6170
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a manufacturing process is designed to produce bolts with a 0.25-in. diameter.
i.e. no of bolts which are produced as per standard is X means then
X is normal with mean = 0.250 and std dev = 0.04
No of bolts tested = 36
If this mean falls outside the interval (0.230,0.270) the production would be shut down.
i.e. P(|x-25|>0.20) =production shut down probability
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a) see the attached spreadsheet (table)
b) Calculate, for a 10-year horizon; Computate for a longer horizon.
c) Year 13; no
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The attached table shows net income projections for the two companies. Calculate's increases by 0.5 million each year; Computate's increases by 15% each year. The result is rounded to the nearest dollar.
__
b) After year 4, Computate's net income is increasing by more than 0.5 million per year, so its growth is faster and getting faster yet. However, in the first 10 years, Calculate's net income remains higher than that of Computate. If we presume that some percentage of net income is returned to investors, then Calculate may provide a better return on investment.
The scenario given here is only interested in the first 10 years. However, beyond that time frame (see part C), we find that Computate's income growth far exceeds that of Calculate.
__
c) Extending the table through year 13, we see that Computate's net income exceeds Calculate's in that year. It continues to remain higher as long as the model remains valid.
Answer:
97
Step-by-step explanation: