Answer:
Italy had a strong connections to the Ottoman Empire. This may have influenced Italy by allowing for the transition of ideas, increasing Italy's Renaissance capital lead / fund. Power changed from nobles to merchants as the Black Death spread through Italy in the mid-1300s (Middle Ages) and destroyed many great nobles. During the Middle Ages, nobles retained wealth and power on land, but through trade, traders retained wealth and power.
Answer:
3 is England
Explanation:
England helped the colonists with the French and Indian war
- Positive and negative do not necessarily equal good or bad in operant conditioning.
- Positive, on the other hand, denotes adding something, and negative, detracting from something.
- Punishment results in a behavior being decreased, whereas reinforcement results in an increase in the behavior.
What is positive and negative reinforcement?
- Consider adding something positive to encourage a response when considering positive reinforcement.
- Consider taking something undesirable away in order to increase a response when thinking about negative reinforcement.
What are the 4 types of reinforcement?
- Four different types of reinforcement exist. There are four types of reinforcement: extinction, punishment, and positive and negative.
- The use of a positive reinforcer is known as positive reinforcement.
Learn more about reinforcement
brainly.com/question/5162646
#SPJ4
Answer: Echoic sensory memory
Explanation:
Echoic sensory memory is type of sensory memory that works for short term for registering and noting the information conveyed through sounds known as auditory information. Whenever the sound stimuli is heard ,it starts to get register in the memory through processing.This auditory stimuli cannot be scanned over repeated times.
According to the question,Suzy can retrieve the information told by Jacques because of echoic sensory memory. She can remember that Jacques has asked her for a movie sensory memory that stored the auditory stimuli in mind for short period of time.
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
