In order to balance this equation you need to count each element and how many of the individual elements are in the equation.
_H2+N2=2 NH3
You multiply the 2 (Which is the coefficient) by the 3 (which is the subscript) This would equal 6 which indicated there are 6 hydrogen atoms on the right side so the left side should also have 6 hydrogen atoms
The missing coefficient on the left side must multiple the 2 to become 6 hydrogen
Answer=3
Peoples cells vary . so theres no definite say
The answer is… Ions are highly charged species that can readily conduct an electrical current. But hydrogen chloride the gas does not exist as ions since there is no solvent medium for them to dissolve into. Hope this helps!
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
1.827 × 10²⁴ molecules H₂S
<h3>
General Formulas and Concepts:</h3>
<u>Math</u>
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
<u>Chemistry</u>
<u>Compounds</u>
- Writing Compounds
- Acids/Bases
<u>Atomic Structure</u>
- Reading a Periodic Table
- Using Dimensional Analysis
- Avogadro's Number - 6.022 × 10²³ atoms, molecules, formula units, etc.
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
103.4 g H₂S (Sulfuric Acid)
<u>Step 2: Identify Conversions</u>
Avogadro's Number
Molar Mass of H - 1.01 g/mol
Molar Mass of S - 32.07 g/mol
Molar Mass of H₂S - 2(1.01) + 32.07 = 34.09 g/mol
<u>Step 3: Convert</u>
- Set up:
- Multiply:
<u>Step 4: Check</u>
<em>Follow sig fig rules and round. We are given 4 sig figs.</em>
1.82656 × 10²⁴ molecules H₂S ≈ 1.827 × 10²⁴ molecules H₂S
Answer:
The term conclusion best illustrates the given statement.
Explanation:
Conclusion refers to a decision or judgment that can be acquired by reasoning. From the observation mentioned in the given table:
1. The steel, aluminum, and bronze took 27, 45 and 80 seconds to dissolve small section of wax, this signifies that more time will be needed by them to transfer heat to the food while cooking. Thus, food will take more time to cook in them.
2. Copper consumed less time, that is, 15 seconds to melt the section of wax than the other metal pots, which signifies that it is a good conductor of heat than the others. Thus, the copper pot would be good for cooking food briskly.
After evaluating the results and observations in an experiment, the conclusion was made that pots made of copper are best for cooking foods.
