Crime, Personality and likely hood of being attacked by other in mates<span />
Answer: coaching leader
Explanation:
What is the Coaching Leadership Style?
This is a leadership style in which the leader focuses on guiding all those who are his or her subordinates.
This is a leader who doesn't just give out taks to employees and make decisions for them but the coaching leader aim at guiding them correctly towards success.
This is a leader who can help the employees improves and attain some new necessary skills through his or her coaching.
He is very interactive with the employees in which things are discussed and evaluated together. He encourages working independently whilst he provides support where they can freely ask for help or when they don't understand certain things.
Answer:
moral reasoning
Explanation:
Moral reasoning is a study in philosophy known as moral philosophy which also overlaps in studies in psychology known as moral development. Moral reasoning is critical analysis to events that may have to deal with moral dilemmas to determine what is morally wrong or right in such situations. Logic and moral theories are typically applied to these analysis(such as utilitarianism) to break down and clarify moral events.
<span>After considerable debate and alteration, the Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Congress on November 15, 1777. This document served as the United States' first constitution, and was in force from March 1, 1781, until 1789 when the present day Constitution went into effect.</span>
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
