Proximity to utilities refers to the availability of public infrastructure services.
Answer:
determining laws' constitutionality.
Explanation:
There are three branches in the Federal government in United States. They are ---
- Executive branch
- Judiciary branch
The Legislative branches of the Federal government makes laws for the citizen of the country.
The Executive branch executes the laws made by the Legislature, it also appoints various ministers to look after the interests of the nation.
The Judicial branch looks whether the laws made are constitutionally correct or not. It can interpret laws if it is unconstitutional.
All the three branches of the Federal government keeps a check on one another.
The Judicial branch sees if any laws passed by the legislature is violating the constitution or not. It can reject a law and can make it null and void if the law passed by the government violates any rights provided by the Constitution of America. It have the power to approve a law or reject a law based on the Constitution of America.
Hence the answer is ---
determining laws' constitutionality.
Answer:
Cross-sectional research method
Explanation:
The Cross-sectional research method is a method of observational study design. Here, in this study the experimenter or the researcher measures and studies the outcome and and exposures in the study participants in the same time.
In the context, An experimenter studies the heredity and the intelligence of the MZ twins who are reared together and for those who are reared apart. The findings of the experiment made by the researcher is a result of a cross sectional research method in this case.
Answer:
Peer testimony
Explanation:
A testimony is simply called a given statement by a person who possesses a reasonable or logical connection to the subject, field or topic and He or she must be a credible source. Mostly, it can be used to either clarify or prove a point.
Peer testimony can simply be defined as when a statement or testimony is being given by an individual who does not have expertise in the that particular area, field or subject that is in question. they can also be called antiauthorities because it's testimony source that is neither expert nor celebrity, but likely to the subject of an audience. Paul may not be an expert in that field but he has personal experience with the issue in question.