Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
4x- 8x-90
= -4x - 90
= -2(2x + 45)
Answer:
7x - 10
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x)= 5x - 7
g(x)= 2x - 3
f(x) + g(x)
= 5x - 7 + 2x - 3
= 7x - 10
Answer:
220
Step-by-step explanation:
Now, I'm not sure if 220 is correct, but I'll explain my reasoning.
We know three angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees.
So, the smaller triangle has 70 degrees and <em>a</em><em> </em>and <em>b</em><em> </em>variables. By virtue, <em>a</em><em> </em>+ <em>b</em><em> </em>+ 70 = 180.
So, <em>a</em><em> </em><em>+</em> <em>b</em><em> </em>= 110.
Likewise, when you look at the whole triangle, 70 degrees is also one of the angles while <em>c</em><em> </em>and <em>d</em><em> </em>are unknown.
So, <em>c</em><em> </em>+ <em>d</em> + 70 = 180.
This means <em>c</em><em> </em>+ <em>d</em><em> </em>= 110.
So, <em>(</em><em>a</em><em> </em>+<em> </em><em>b</em><em> </em>) +<em> </em><em>(</em><em>c</em><em> </em>+<em> </em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>)</em><em> </em><em>=</em><em> </em>
110 + 110 =
220 degrees.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
<em>The probability that a randomly selected government worker witnessed a violation of ethical standards, policies or laws in the past year but did not report it is </em><em>0.3</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
The outcome of the Washington- based nonprofit research group are that -
- P (60) -60% of government workers acknowledge witnessing violations of ethical standards, policies, or laws in the past year;
- P (40%) - of which went unreported.
- P (10) - An additional 10% of government workers acknowledged making false reports of violations of ethical standards, policies or laws when they did not actually occur.
∴ P(60%) + P(10%) = P(70) which is Probability of those that are involved in one form of violations or the other.
Therefore, P(100%) - P(70%) = 30%
P( Not committed and withnessed any violations of ethical standards, policie or law) = 30%/100%
<em>= 0.3</em>
Answer:
9 a²+24a+16
Step-by-step explanation:
hope it's helpful to you ☺️
