174=(1+455)c
c=174/456
c=0,3815789474
Answer:
D. specific performance.
Explanation:
Specific performance -
It is the act or the order by the court , in order to solve an any conflict for the law of contract .
This is basically used to solve any issue related to land , property or any goods or services , this practice is used in case of any personal service .
It helps the people to against any form of injustice or malpractice .
It is a form of forced action , which helps with some previous transaction , and is one of the best remedy for the problem .
Answer:
$255,000
Explanation:
If a company acquires shares of another company the investment amount is shown in the balance sheet of the acquirer. When Plate acquired shares of Silver, it reported the investment of $225,000. The Silver reports a profit of $30,000 on January 2019. The amount reflected in the balance sheet of Plate will be $255,000. This is the sum of investment plus the profit reported by the Silver.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
This isn't even a question