Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
Answer: The second answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y = 6/(x - 8).
Step-by-step explanation:
z = k/y where k is a constant
2 = k/3
k = 6.
So z = 6/y
and x = 6/y + 8
Multiply through by y:
xy = 6 + 8y
xy - 8y = 6
y(x - 8) = 6
y = 6/(x - 8)
Answer:
its 4
Step-by-step explanation:
A) angle 1 = angle 2 - Incorrect
These angles are only on one of the following lines, which means that they do not show that lines C and D are parallel. In addition, angles 1 and 2 are supplementary, so they could not be equal.
B) angle 1 + angle 2 = 180 - Incorrect
Though this is true, this does not prove that lines C and D are parallel because both of these angles are on the same line.
C) angle 2 = angle 3 - Correct
These angles are alternate interior angles and there are angles on both lines, which proves that lines C and D are parallel.
D) angle 2 + angle 3 = 180 - Incorrect
These angles are equivalent, so they cannot add up to 180 degrees unless the intersecting line was perpendicular to both lines C and D.
Hope this helps!! :)
