Answer:
3 <u>> </u>x
Step-by-step explanation:
(Sorry if im wrong)
Divide both sides by 6
18/6 <u>></u> 6x/6
3 <u>></u> x
1) Definitions:
1.1) Inverse statement: negating the hypothesis and the conclusion of the original statement, i.e.:
conditional statement: p → q
inverse: ~p → ~q (the symbol ~ means the negation)
1.2) Converse statement: switching the hypothesis and the conclusion of the conditional statement, i.e.:
conditional statement: p → q
converse: q → p
2) converse of the given statement
conditional: <span>If a line is vertical, then it has undefined slope.
converse: switch the hypothesis and the conclusion
if a line has undefined slope, then it is vertical <------- answer
</span>3) Inverse of the given statement
conditional: if <span>a line is vertical, then it has undefined slope.
inverse: negate both hypothesis and conclusion.
</span>if a line is not vertical, then it does not have an undefined slope <---answer
Answer:
6x-3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1st option
Step-by-step explanation:
4
÷ 2
( change mixed numbers into improper fractions )
=
÷ ![\frac{13}{5}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B13%7D%7B5%7D%20)
To perform the division
leave 1st fraction, change ÷ to × , turn 2nd fraction ' upside down'
=
× ![\frac{5}{13}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B13%7D%20)
Answer:because they are both interscting DUUUUUUUUHHHHHHH
Step-by-step explanation: