<em>What does this statement suggest about how Beveridge believes Americans should address the natural resources within our country? </em>
Senator Beveridge is a person who believes that progress should be continuous and that it should always be positive. He seems to believe that growth and civilization is necessary, and he most likely gives little thought to social or environmental concerns. Therefore, it is likely that the senator would believe Americans should constantly utilize the resources in their country to create more growth and more expansion.
<em>Does this statement suggest a special position for Americans as they pursue growth and prosperity? </em>
This statement tells us that the senator believes Americans to be chosen by God to lead this unstoppable progress. Therefore, they have a special position when it comes to pursuing growth and prosperity. He also believes Americans to be superior to other races, which he calls "savages."
<em>What has been the outcome of this position?</em>
The most direct outcome of this position has been imperialism. This attitude played an important role in events in American history such as the annexation of the Philippines.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
a
Explanation:
the students who has been thinking about it
