You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
106
Step-by-step explanation:
Each of the whole numbers could be 4 greater than the value it is rounded down to. Then the maximum original sum is ...
90 +4 +4 +4 +4 = 106
__
<em>Example</em>
The numbers could be 14, 24, 34, 34. Their rounded values are 10, 20, 30, 30, for a total of 90. The total of the original numbers is 106.
A decimal that is like .11 the amount of #s in the decimal is 2 so it'll mean 2 0s like that would be 11/100. So if it was .209 it would be 209/1000.
The equivalent expression of (1.4³/1.2⁴)⁻⁶ is gotten as; 1.2²/1.4³
<h3>How to use rule of exponents?</h3>
We are given the expression as;
(1.4³/1.2⁴)⁻⁶
Now, according to rule of exponents in multiplication, we know that;
x² × x³ = x² ⁺ ³ = x⁵
Thus, applying that rule of exponents above to our given problem and we have;
(1.4³/1.2⁴)⁻⁶ = (1.4³ ⁻ ⁶)/(1.2⁴ ⁻ ⁶)
⇒ 1.4⁻³/1.2⁻²
Also according to rule of exponents we know that;
x⁻¹ = 1/x
x⁻² = 1/x²
Thus;
1.4⁻³/1.2⁻² = (1/1.4³)/(1/1.2²)
⇒ 1.2²/1.4³
Thus, we can conclude about the question that the equivalent expression of (1.4³/1.2⁴)⁻⁶ is gotten as; 1.2²/1.4³
Read more about Rule of Exponents at; brainly.com/question/11761858
#SPJ1
