Which of these materials is permeable?

By what factor would your weight increase if you could stand on the sun? (never mind that you can't.)

Fofino [41]

Gravity on the surface of sun is given as

$g = \frac{GM}{R^2}$

here we know that

$M = 1.98 \times 10^{30} kg$

$R = 6.95 \times 10^8 m$

now we will have

$g = \frac{(6.67 \times 10^{-11})(1.98 \times 10^30)}{(6.95 \times 10^8)^2}$

$g = 273.4 m/s^2$

now we need to find the ratio of weight on surface of sun and on surface of Earth

$R = \frac{mg_{sun}}{mg_{earth}}$

$R = \frac{273.4}{9.8} = 28 times$

so weight will increase by 28 times

6 0

2 years ago

What pressure expressed in pascals equals 70 N/m2?

12345 [234]

Pascals = N/m2
so it is the same unit
the answer is 70 Pa

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During normal beating, a heart creates a maximum 3.95-mV potential across 0.305 m of a person’s chest, creating a 0.75-Hz electr

WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

E = 0.0130 V/m.

Explanation:

The electric field is related to the potential difference as follows:

$E = \frac{\Delta V}{d}$

Where:

E: is electric field

ΔV: is the potential difference = 3.95 mV

d: is the distance of a person's chest = 0.305 m

Then, the electric field is:

$E = \frac{\Delta V}{d} = \frac{3.95 \cdot 10^{-3} V}{0.305 m} = 0.0130 V/m$

Therefore, the maximum electric field created is 0.0130 V/m.

I hope it helps you!

7 0

2 years ago

A major difference between radio waves, visible light, and gamma rays is the ____ of the photons, which results in the different

olga2289 [7]

The sentence can be completed as follows:
"A major difference between radio waves, visible light, and gamma rays is the energy of the photons, which results in the different photon frequencies and wavelengths."

In fact, gamma rays have greater energy than visible light and visible light has greater energy than radio waves. The energy E of a photon is related to its frequency, f, by
 $E=hf$
where h is the Planck constant. We see from this formula that the higher the frequency, the greater the energy. Instead, the wavelength is inversely proportional to the frequency:
 $\lambda= \frac{c}{f}$
where c is the speed of light. Since the frequency is directly proportional to the energy, this means that the wavelength is inversely proportional to the energy.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I am trying to find the magnitude of a resultant vector. Do i take inconsideration the negatives when i find the x & y compo

attashe74 [19]

Absolutely ! If you have two vectors with equal magnitudes and opposite
directions, then one of them is the negative of the other. Their correct
vector sum is zero, and that's exactly the magnitude of the resultant vector.

(Think of fifty football players pulling on each end of the rope in a tug-of-war.
Their forces are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign, and the flag that
hangs from the middle of the rope goes nowhere, because the resultant
force on it is zero.)

This gross, messy explanation is completely applicable when you're totaling up
the x-components or the y-components.

4 0

3 years ago

Which of these materials is permeable?​

Which of these materials is permeable?