1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaK [193]
2 years ago
9

Even if there were some friction on the ice, it is still possible to use conservation of momentum to solve this problem, but you

would need to impose an additional condition on the problem. What is that additional condition
Physics
1 answer:
hjlf2 years ago
6 0

The problem referred to in this question is missing and it is;

Two hockey pucks of identical mass are on a flat, horizontal ice hockey rink. The red puck is motionless; the blue puck is moving at 2.5 m/s to the left. It collides with the motionless red puck. The pucks have a mass of 15 g. After the collision, the red puck is moving at 2.5 m/s, to the left. What is the final velocity of the blue puck?

Answer:

The condition is that p_f - p_i which is the change in momentum will not be equal to zero but equal to the impulse (Ft).

Explanation:

In the problem described, by inspection, we can say that since there is no friction, we have a closed system and thus momentum is conserved.

Since momentum is conserved, we can say that;

Initial momentum(p_i) = final momentum(p_f)

Now, in this question we are told that some friction wants to be introduced on the ice and it's possible to still use conservation of momentum.

From impulse - momentum theory, we know that;

Impulse = change in momentum

Impulse is zero when no force is acting on the ice and we have; 0 = p_f - p_i

This will yield initial momentum = final momentum.

Now, since a force is applied, we know that impulse is; J = F × t

Thus;

Ft = p_f - p_i

Where F is the force due to friction.

Thus, the condition is that p_f - p_i will not be equal to zero

You might be interested in
The CEO, ellen misk, left her martian office but accidentally left a cylindricall can of coke (3.1 inches in diameter, 5.42 inch
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

Specific Gravity = 0.378

Explanation:

First, we will find the force exerted by the can on the table. This force will be equal to the weight of the can:

Pressure = Force/Area = Weight/Area

Weight = Pressure*Area

where,

Area = πdiameter²/4 = π[(3.1 in)(0.0254 m/1 in)]²/4 = 4.8 x 10⁻³ m²

Weight = (510 N/m²)(4.8 x 10⁻³ m²)

Weight = 2.48 N

Now, the weight is given as:

Weight = mg

2.48 N = m(9.8 m/s²)

m = (2.48 N)/(9.8 m/s²)

m = 0.25 kg

Now, we calculate volume of can:

Volume = (Area)(Height) = (4.8 x 10⁻³ m²)(5.42 in)(0.0254 m/1 in)

Volume = 6.6 x 10⁻⁴ m³

Hence, the density of can will be:

Density of Can = m/Volume = 0.25 kg/6.6 x 10⁻⁴ m³

Density of Can = 378.32 kg/m³

So, the specific gravity of Can will be:

Specific Gravity = Density of Can/Density of Water

Specific Gravity = (378.32 kg/m³)/(1000 kg/m³)

<u>Specific Gravity = 0.378</u>

8 0
3 years ago
A rod has a radius of 10 mm is subjected to an axial load of 15 N such that the axial strain in the rod is ????௫ = 2.75*10-6, de
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Knowing we only have one load applied in just one direction we have to use the Hooke's law for one dimension

ex = бx/E

бx = Fx/A = Fx/πr^{2}

Using both equation and solving for the modulus of elasticity E

E = бx/ex = Fx / πr^{2}ex

E = \frac{15}{pi (10 * 10^{-3})^{2} * 2.75 * 10^{-6}    } = 17.368 * 10^{9} Pa = 17.4 GPa

Apply the Hooke's law for either y or z direction (circle will change in every direction) we can find the change in radius

ey = \frac{1}{E} (бy - v (бx + бz)) = -\frac{v}{E}бx

= \frac{vFx}{Epir^{2} } = \frac{0.23 * 15}{pi (10 * 10^{-3)^{2} } * 17.362 * 10^{9}  } = -0.63 *10^{-6}

Finally

ey = Δr / r

Δr = ey * r = 10 * -0.63* 10^{-6} mm = -6.3 * 10^{-6} mm

Δd = 2Δr = -12.6 * 10^{-6} mm

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is the kinetic energy of a 2.7kg book
Tanya [424]
16.5375 .................
3 0
3 years ago
What trends were seen in Mendeleev’s periodic table?
katrin [286]
He arranged his periodic table by each elements atomic mass
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When compared to other types of waves, electromagnetic waves differ because they are
expeople1 [14]
They differ because they are transverse wave. That is their direction of travel is perpendicular to its vibrations.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I don't get it can you please help me?
    9·2 answers
  • What is wave polarization?
    5·1 answer
  • Which best describes the definition for the atomic mass of an element
    9·2 answers
  • A 5000-kg freight car crashes into a 10,000-kg freight car at rest. They couple upon collision and move with a speed of 2 m/s. W
    13·1 answer
  • A parallel-plate vacuum capacitor has 7.72 J of energy stored in it. The separation between the plates is 3.30 mm. If the separa
    11·1 answer
  • What stages of life has Betelgeuse already lived through?
    14·1 answer
  • This is an example of A) alpha decay B) beta decay C) gamma decay D) half-life decay
    14·1 answer
  • The unit used for measuring force is called the
    14·2 answers
  • Es muy común que cuando se viaja hacia un río o lago se juegue “ranita”, el cual consiste en lanzar una piedra horizontalmente h
    15·1 answer
  • Part A-Circumference of a circle
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!