Answer:
share thoughts on how to work more efficient
Explanation:
this is good teamwork, he should try to help his teammates do better and contribute more. listening to others whining and complaining just increases the workload and stress, which will make things more difficult in the long run. helping his teammates with their work makes him do more and his teammates do less (in other words the work wasn't distributed equally between the team). Sydney should not have to worry about his work and his teammates' work as well. he should give his teammates tips on how they can work better to help them become more concentrated and focused.
One reason some argue that campaign financing should be restricted it is because such a step can protect our democracy from being corrupted by big money. Allowing campaign financiers to spend as much money as they can will result in people with certain interests having control over government
You are participating in a<u> "focus group interview"</u>.
Focus group interview is an apparatus for subjective statistical surveying where a gathering of individuals are chosen and got some information about their sentiment or recognitions about a specific topic or product. Focus group research is utilized to create or enhance items or administrations. The fundamental object is to give information to improve change or make an item or administration focused at a key client gathering.
Answer: C, tell the audience what you have told them
Explanation:
The purpose of the conclusion is to summarize your main points and to prepare the audience for the end of your speech. ... It is especially important to remember that the conclusion of your speech is not the time to introduce new points or new supporting evidence; doing so will only confuse the audience.
When an argument is deductively valid, its <u>truth of premises </u>guarantee the truth of its <u>conclusion</u>.
<h3>What is a deductively valid argument?</h3>
A deductive argument is an argument intended by the arguer to be deductive, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truthfulness of the conclusion provided that the premises of the argument are true.
It can also be expressed by saying that, in a deductive argument, the premises are intended to provide strong support for the conclusion that if the premises were true, the conclusion could not be false.
The argument in which the premise succeeds in securing the conclusion is called a valid (inferential) argument. If a valid argument has a true premise, the argument is also said to be valid. All arguments are valid or invalid, and valid or not; there's no middle point, like there's some relevance.
To learn more about deductively valid argument from given link
brainly.com/question/14585049
#SPJ4
