Answer:
A
Explanation
This organization is a legitimate pediatric society, and would only make decisions that follow laws, policies, and authorizations. They took these statistics and, in the common interest of the people, created recommendations for minors.
Answer: It makes addictive with the chemicals and stuff like that also it is not healthy for your kindly
Explanation:
he has cryptorchidism
by the way can i get brainliest my dude thx :D
Answer:
Since the 1970s, historical studies of food in particular cultures have emerged as a new field, “culinary history.” Culinary history studies the origins and development of the foodstuffs, equipment, and techniques of cookery, the presentation and eating of meals, and the meanings of these activities to the societies that produce them. It looks at practices on both sides of the kitchen door, at the significance of the food to the cook and to those who consume it, and at how cooking is done and what the final product means. Consequently, culinary history is widely interdisciplinary. Studies make connections between the sciences – medical, biological, and social – and the humanities and draw heavily on anthropology, economics, psychology, folklore, literature, and the fine arts, as well as history. These multidisciplinary perspectives are integrated along geographic and temporal dimensions, and as a consequence, culinary history encompasses the whole process of procuring food from land or laboratory, moving it through processors and market-places, and finally placing it on the stove and onto the table. It emphasizes the role that food-related activities play in defining community, class, and social status – as epitomized in such fundamental human acts as the choice and consumption of one’s daily bread.
Culinary history can also be defined by what it is not. It is not, for example, simply a narrative account of what was eaten by a particular people at a particular time. Nor is it a matter of rendering entertaining stories about food, or telling anecdotes of people cooking and eating, or surveying cookbooks.
Explanation:hope this helped! :)
Answer:
One or more people are needed in order for an organization to work.
Explanation:
A is the correct answer because by the definition of organization, it is one or more people that make it as such, or with other words only one person can be enough to make an organization.
B is not correct, as even though two people make an organization, it is not a necessity.
C is not correct because even though it is very common for an organization to be comprised of 5 people, it is only that is actually needed to make one.
D is not correct, despite lot of organizations are comprised of 10 or more people, it is not something necessery for an organization to function and be recognized as such.
