Answer:
Number of families that should be surveyed if one wants to be 90% sure of being able to estimate the true mean PSLT within 0.5 is at least 43.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that one wants to estimate the mean PSLT for the population of all families in New York City with gross incomes in the range $35.000 to $40.000.
If sigma equals 2.0, we have to find that how many families should be surveyed if one wants to be 90% sure of being able to estimate the true mean PSLT within 0.5.
Here, we will use the concept of Margin of error as the statement "true mean PSLT within 0.5" represents the margin of error we want.
<u></u>
<u>SO, Margin of error formula is given by;</u>
Margin of error =
where,
= significance level = 10%
= standard deviation = 2.0
n = number of families
Now, in the z table the critical value of x at 5% (
) level of significance is 1.645.
SO, Margin of error =
0.5 =

n =
= 43.3 ≈ 43
Therefore, number of families that should be surveyed if one wants to be 90% sure of being able to estimate the true mean PSLT within 0.5 is at least 43.
A. 2m+5=total
<span>B. $305 </span>
It should be the second one
The picture in the attached figure
step 1we know that
It is given that AD and BD are bisectors of ∠CAB and ∠CBA respectively.
Therefore,
x = ∠CAB/2 -----> equation 1
y = ∠CBA/2 -----> equation 2
step 2In triangle ABC,
∠CAB + ∠CBA + ∠ACB = 180° ----> [The sum of all three angles of a
triangle is 180°]
∠CAB + ∠CBA + 110° = 180°
∠CAB + ∠CBA = 180° - 110°
∠CAB + ∠CBA = 70° ------> divide by 2 both sides
∠CAB/2 + ∠CBA/2 = 70/2 -------> equation 3
substitute equation 1 and equation 2 in equation 3
x+y=35
hence
the answer isx+y =35°
⇒ x + y = 35° ...[From equation (1) and (2)]
Answer:
A I think
Step-by-step explanation:
because if you add them up.