Answer:
fancy.
Explanation:
Some general characteristics of baroque music are single melodic idea.
Answer:
a. proved essential for the success of Grant’s attrition strategy.
Explanation:
The Union is known as the "North" and the Confederacy is known as the "South".
At the event of the American Civil War, the Union also know as the "United States of America" under the presidentship of Abraham Lincoln was opposed by 11 southern states known as the "Confederate States of America" under the presidentship of Jefferson Davis.
Abraham Lincoln believed that he could win over the Confederacy states until and unless he have control over the border states, mainly Maryland.
Union's man power was more as they had nearly 20 states associated with them.
The Union in order to win over the Confederacy States made strategies to gradually reduced the power of the Confederacy States.
Thus the advantage that the Union's soldier or manpower have over the Confederacy has proved to be essential for the success of Grant’s attrition strategy.
Hence the answer is
a. proved essential for the success of Grant’s attrition strategy.
D. Many people bought cars
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
