Computer simulation is useful because it helps in the prediction of what will likely happen in the future using data from past events.
<h3>What is computer simulation?</h3>
- This is the use of computer models to represents a hypothetical scenarios that are likely to be obtained in the real world.
Computer simulations are useful in studying phenomena in the universe because they help us to achieve the followings;
- It helps in the prediction of what will likely happen in the future using data from past events.
- It saves cost and time of carrying out actual experiments.
- It can help prevent a disaster that may occur in the future.
Learn more about computer simulations here: brainly.com/question/22214039
In order to answer these questions, we need to know the charges on
the electron and proton, and then we need to know the electron's mass.
I'm beginning to get the creepy feeling that, in return for the generous
5 points, you also want me to go and look these up so I can use them
in calculations ... go and collect my own straw to make the bricks with,
as it were.
Ok, Rameses:
Elementary charge . . . . . 1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ coulomb
negative on the electron
plussitive on the proton
Electron rest-mass . . . . . 9.11 x 10⁻³¹ kg
a). The force between two charges is
F = (9 x 10⁹) Q₁ Q₂ / R²
= (9 x 10⁹ m/farad) (-1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹C) (1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹C) / (5.35 x 10⁻¹¹m)²
= ( -2.304 x 10⁻²⁸) / (5.35 x 10⁻¹¹)²
= 8.05 x 10⁻⁸ Newton .
b). Centripetal acceleration =
v² / r .
A = (2.03 x 10⁶)² / (5.35 x 10⁻¹¹)
= 7.7 x 10²² m/s² .
That's an enormous acceleration ... about 7.85 x 10²¹ G's !
More than enough to cause the poor electron to lose its lunch.
It would be so easy to check this work of mine ...
First I calculated the force, then I calculated the centripetal acceleration.
I didn't use either answer to find the other one, and I didn't use " F = MA "
either.
I could just take the ' F ' that I found, and the 'A' that I found, and the
electron mass that I looked up, and mash the numbers together to see
whether F = M A .
I'm going to leave that step for you. Good luck !
<h3>Question:</h3>
•What is the all time speed record for completing the iditarod?
Answer:
•In 2016, Dallas broke his own record, finishing in 8 days, 11 hours, 20 minutes and 16 seconds. In 2017, Mitch Seavey broke all previous records by finishing in 8 days, 3 hours, 40 minutes and 13 seconds, which currently stands as the fastest winning time for the Iditarod.
Explanation:
#Let's Study
#I Hope It's Help
#Keep On Learning
#Carry On Learning
- Demand of natural resources have influenced human settlement plans .
- Clean air,clean water and food are examples of natural resources
How demands became the obstacles ?
- The demands forces the human to go to different places in order to fulfill their requirements .
- So they have to shift their homes to different places .
