One of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the Nature vs Nurture debate. Each of these sides have good points that it's really hard to decide whether a person's development is predisposed in his DNA, or a majority of it is influenced by this life experiences and his environment.
Regarding human traits, Locke would most likely agree with Aristotle.
There are more areas where Aristotle and Locke's philosophical views diverge than where they concur. For instance, Aristotle once claimed that a person's happiness was just as important to them as it was to their political community. The political understanding of Locke, however, is different because, in his view, a government only assumes responsibility for a portion of the human rights that it is meant to protect in accordance with what people deem to be right. Individuals are therefore given priority because they have rights that are inalienable and shouldn't be manipulated by people to fit their agenda. These and other traditional philosophies have been used to analyze and comprehend early philosophy.
Learn more about Locke here:-
brainly.com/question/13346823?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Prostatis, or inflammation of the prostate (elevated PSA), likely due to bacterial infection, hence the elevated white blood cell count. This is sometimes also referred to as benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH).
Answer: conocimiento
Explanation: Primer conocimiento de una cosa por medio de las impresiones que comunican los sentidos.
Answer:
d. all of the above
Explanation:
The ectoderm, neural crest and underlying mesoderm have been implicated in the induction of the neural tissue.
