1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
m_a_m_a [10]
3 years ago
8

Explain why rational exponenets are not defined when the denominator of the exponent in lowest terms is even and the base is neg

ative.
Mathematics
2 answers:
ch4aika [34]3 years ago
6 0
Assume x > 0 then (-x)^(1/2) = sqrt(-x) and we cant take sqaure roots of negative numbers.............yet

so (-3)^(1/4) is<span><span>−3</span><span>−−−</span>√4</span>which is not ok but<span><span>−3</span><span>−−−</span>√3</span>is fine
Leona [35]3 years ago
4 0
Such a square root of a negative base wouldn't be possible. Because two (or just even numbers in general) negative numbers will always equal a positive number when multiplied, the rational exponent would not be defined because it isn't possible to conclude with a negative answer. However, if the denominator of the rational exponent happened to be an odd number, the problem would be solvable. When the denominator is an odd number it allows for the base to be negative because three negatives multiplied together give a negative answer. If the denominator of the exponent is even and the base is negative, the rational exponent will not be defined because it isn't possible.
You might be interested in
I need help correct gets crown answer quick!
Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

6,7, and 10

Step-by-step explanation:

If this answer helped you then please mark it as brainliest so I can get to the next rank

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls Solve This! I'll give Brainilest and points! :D
Kruka [31]

Answer:

(8,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

because its ON the line and the line is dotted. if the line was solid it would be a solution but it is not because the line is dotted

4 0
3 years ago
Quadrilateral ABCD is an isosceles trapezoid. If || , AB = m + 6, CD = 3m + 2, BC = 3m, and AD = 7m – 16, solve for m.
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

m=2

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
BRAINLIESSSSTTTT!!!
trapecia [35]
A. (-5,1)
B. (-5,4)
C. (-2,4)

6 0
3 years ago
Identify the equations as parallel lines, perpendicular lines, or neither.
Alex

Answer:

B. Parallel

Step-by-step explanation:

Equation 1 simplified:   y = 3x+7

Equation 2 simplified: y = -x/3-3

The slopes are completely different, ruling out the possibility of the lines being parallel.

But we also see the slopes of the equations are opposite and negative to each other. Making the lines perpendicular.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • (02.02)Pat paid $85.50 for renting a scooter for 6 hours. What was the rate per hour for renting the scooter? (Input only numeri
    9·1 answer
  • Help! need these answers filled in for school asap
    11·1 answer
  • Help please 10 minutes!!!!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • the probability of drawing a heart from a standard deck of 52 playing cards is 1/4. The probability of drawing a face card from
    6·2 answers
  • What is the vertex of the graph of y = 3x2 + 2x + 1?
    11·2 answers
  • 11 pt equals how many fl oz
    8·2 answers
  • In what two ways can the climax of a story affect the main character?
    8·1 answer
  • Answer This plz I need it <br> only answer if you know the answer and need the steps
    8·2 answers
  • Darius created a factor tree and wrote the prime factorization of 60 shown here.
    7·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this question please. I've been struggling.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!