Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1
Hope this was what you’re looking for ^.^
(If correct, if you don’t mind can you please mark me as the brainliest, it’s okay if not)
Answer:
80
Step-by-step explanation:
1 centimeter is equal to 20 feet so if you have 4 cm, it's will 4*20
Also the other two answers are too small to be possible
Answer:
4159277
Step-by-step explanation:
156218 and 8162336
Add the two numbers and divide by 2
(156218 + 8162336)/2 =
8318554/2=
4159277