Outsourcing because a third party is someone who is not one of the main people involved in a business.
Answer: The Contract is valid.
Explanation:
Under the UCC’s Statute of Frauds, transactions above $500 for goods cannot be made orally alone and have to be written in writing as well. This is the law that Rosenfield relied on.
However, Fallsview can argue that the Passover Retreat is not a Good, but rather a Service in which case it does not fall under the Statute.
The main bone of contention thereby becomes, if indeed it is a service or a good.
If it is a Hybrid of both, then the Court needs to decide if the services outweigh the goods involved.
From the text we see that the following were included in the package, food, entertainment, and lectures on religious subjects.
Food is the only good there and is outweighed by Entertainment and lectures on religious subjects.
As such, the contract is valid as it is for more service than good.
It would make you $7,500
because banks usually pay a person $0.03 for every dollar
250,000 times .03 equals 7,500
Components inc., a maker of vehicle parts, refuses to sell to diy repair inc., a national vehicle service firm. the maker convinces the engine parts company, a competitor, to do the same. this is a group boycott.
Under competition law, a group boycott is a type of secondary boycott, unless two or more competitors in the relevant market agree to deal with an actual or potential competitor of the boycotting firm. Refuse to do business with the company.
Example: The FTC challenged the actions of several groups of competing health care providers, such as physicians, and refused to do business with insurance companies or other purchasers on terms other than those mutually agreed upon. That amounted to a group boycott of the illegal group.
Learn more about group boycott here: brainly.com/question/13894564
#SPJ4
I believe the answer to this question is : False
