Answer: High supportive, low directive
Explanation: High supportive , low directive is the leadership method in which the supporting act is main focus and low instructional approach is present. The leader of this method provide help in solving issue by support and let the followers make their decision.
The situation mentioned in question describes that Maria is using high supportive and low directive techniques.She provides the followers the daily decision control and still try to help them in their activities by providing them assistance and support.She does not strictly instructs the followers.
Someone like this should consider career or technical education.
please mark me brainliest
Answer:
It is true that Emotional contagion can be done through talking to the other person and synchronization of one's vocalizations, postures and movements
Explanation:
To understand this answer we need to remember the concept and its characteristics so here I go. Emotional contagion describes that one persons' emotions can impact someone else awakening similar emotions just by being observed. They can be induced consciously or unconsciously. However, the way they express their emotions and how they make the other person experience similar emotions is done unconsciously and very important to create emotional synchrony and achieve a profound level of understanding in the relationship.
Cultural capital concerns certain types of skills that are developed by children, these skills are passed from parents to children, usually parents of the social middle class. Reading skills, watching documentaries, playing classical instruments. These children have better academic development than others.
People with cultural capital skills always get people's attention, stand out, unlike those who don't, who aren't seen as capable by society.
Answer:
Omar has developed an intervention to improve the relationship between parents and their preschool-aged children. To evaluate the effectiveness of his intervention, Omar video-records parents interacting with their children and has two research assistants score the level of warmth in each interaction. Omar then compares the two sets of scores to examine <u>interrater
</u> reliability. He finds a high positive correlation of <u>r = .87</u>
between the two raters’ scores. If the observers were rating a categorical variable, Omar could have also looked at the <u>kappa</u> statistic.
Explanation:
