All categories

3 years ago

Evaluate if a = 28 and b = -3

Mathematics

2 answers:

Nata [24]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The answer is 4

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

horsena [70]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Replace a with 28 and b with -3

You might be interested in

Which set of numbers is arranged in order from least to greatest?

charle [14.2K]

The answer is: [C]: -0.7, ⅕, 0.35, ⅔ .
________________________________________
Explanation:
_________________________________________
<span>
Note that in this correct Answer choice "C" given, we have the following arrangement of numbers:
_____________________________________________________
</span>→ -0.7, ⅕, 0.35, ⅔ ;
______________________________________
We are asked to find the "Answer choice" (or, perhaps, "Answer choices?") given that show a set of numbers arranged in order from "least to greatest"; that is, starting with a value that is the smallest number in the arrangement, and sequentially progressing, in order from least to greatest, with the largest (greatest) number in the arrangement appearing as the last number in the arrangement.
______________________
Note the EACH of the 4 (four) answer choices given consists of an arrangement with ONLY one negative number, "- 0.7". Only TWO of the answer choices—Choices "B" and "C"—have an arrangement beginning with the number, "-0.7 "; So we can "rule out" the "Answer choices: [A] and [D]".
________________________
Let us examine: Answer choice: [B]: <span>-0.7, 0.35, ⅕, ⅔ ;
</span>_________________________
Note: The fraction, "⅕" = "2/10"; or, write as: 0.2 .
________________________________________
The fraction, "⅔" = 0.6666667 (that is 0.6666... repeating; so we often see a "final decimal point" rounded to "7" at some point.
___________________________________________
Through experience, one will be able to automatically look at these 2 (two) fractions and immediately know their "decimal equivalents".
____________________________________________
Otherwise, one can determine the "decimal form" of these values on a calculator by division:
_________________________
→ ⅕ = 1/5 = 1 ÷ 5 = 0.2
_________________________
→ ⅔ = 2/3 = 2 ÷ 3 = 0.6666666666666667
___________________________________
For Answer choice: [B], we have:
______________________________
→ -0.7, 0.35, ⅕, ⅔ ;
_________________________
→ So, we can "rewrite" the arrangement of "Answer choice [B]" as:
___________________________________________
→ -0.7, 0.35, 0.2, 0.666666667 ;
________________________________
→ And we can see that "Answer choice: [B]" is INCORRECT; because
"0.2" (that is, "⅕"), is LESS THAN "0.35". So, "0.35" should not come BEFORE "⅕" in the arrangement that applies correctly to the problem.
_______________________________________
Let us examine: Answer choice: [C]: -0.7, ⅕, 0.35, 0.666666667 .
____________________________________________
→ Remember from our previous— and aforementioned—examination of "Answer Choice: [B]" ; that:
____________________________
→ ⅕ = 0.2 ; and:
→ ⅔ = 0.666666667
_______________________
So, given:
____________
→ Answer choice: [C]: -0.7, ⅕, 0.35, ⅔ ;
______________________
→ We can "rewrite" this given "arrangement", substituting our known "decimal values for the fractions:
______________________________
→ Answer choice: [C]: -0.7, 0.2, 0.35, 0.666666667 ;
_________________________________________
→ As mentioned above, this sequence starts with "-0.7", which is the ONLY negative number in the sequence; as such, the next positive number is correct. Nonetheless, "0.2" (or, "(⅕") is the next number in the sequence, and is greater than "-0.7". The next number is "0.35. "0.35" is greater than "⅕" (or, "0.2"). Then next number is "(⅔)" (or, "0.666666667").
"(⅔)"; (or, "0.666666667") is greater than 0.35.
____________________________
This set of numbers: "-0.7, ⅕, 0.35, ⅔" ; is arranged in order from least to greatest; which is "Answer choice: [C]: -0.7, ⅕, 0.35, ⅔" ; the correct answer.
________________________________________________________

6 0

3 years ago

Hello !!!!!!Please help me ASAP

andriy [413]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helped you out

5 0

3 years ago

"find the reduction formula for the integral" sin^n(18x)

dexar [7]

Let

$I(n,a)=\displaystyle\int\sin^nax\,\mathrm dx$
For demonstration on how to tackle this sort of problem, I'll only work through the case where $n$ is odd. We can write

$\displaystyle\int\sin^nax\,\mathrm dx=\int\sin^{n-2}ax\sin^2ax\,\mathrm dx=\int\sin^{n-2}ax(1-\cos^2ax)\,\mathrm dx$
$\implies I(n,a)=I(n-2,a)-\displaystyle\int\sin^{n-2}ax\cos^2ax\,\mathrm dx$

For the remaining integral, we can integrate by parts, taking

$u=\sin^{n-3}ax\implies\mathrm du=a(n-3)\sin^{n-4}ax\cos ax\,\mathrm dx$ $\mathrm dv=\sin ax\cos^2ax\,\mathrm dx\implies v=-\dfrac1{3a}\cos^3ax$

$\implies\displaystyle\int\sin^{n-2}ax\cos^2ax\,\mathrm dx=-\dfrac1{3a}\sin^{n-3}ax\cos^3ax+\dfrac{a(n-3)}{3a}\int\sin^{n-4}ax\cos^4ax\,\mathrm dx$

For this next integral, we rewrite the integrand

$\sin^{n-4}ax\cos^4ax=\sin^{n-4}ax(1-\sin^2ax)^2=\sin^{n-4}ax-2\sin^{n-2}ax+\sin^nax$
$\implies\displaystyle\int\sin^{n-4}ax\cos^4ax\,\mathrm dx=I(n-4,a)-2I(n-2,a)+I(n,a)$

So putting everything together, we found

$I(n,a)=I(n-2,a)-\displaystyle\int\sin^{n-2}ax\cos^2ax\,\mathrm dx$
$I(n,a)=I(n-2,a)-\left(-\dfrac1{3a}\sin^{n-3}ax\cos^3ax+\dfrac{n-3}3\displaystyle\int\sin^{n-4}ax\cos^4ax\,\mathrm dx\right)$
$I(n,a)=I(n-2,a)-\dfrac{n-3}3\bigg(I(n-4,a)-2I(n-2,a)+I(n,a)\bigg)+\dfrac1{3a}\sin^{n-3}ax\cos^3ax$
$\dfrac n3I(n,a)=\dfrac{2n-3}3I(n-2,a)-\dfrac{n-3}3I(n-4,a)+\dfrac1{3a}\sin^{n-3}ax\cos^3ax$

$\implies I(n,a)=\dfrac{2n-3}nI(n-2,a)-\dfrac{n-3}nI(n-4,a)+\dfrac1{na}\sin^{n-3}ax\cos^3ax$

7 0

3 years ago

Casey wants to buy a gym membership. One gym has a $176 joining fee and costs $29 per month. Another gym has no joining fee and

kaheart [24]

Answer:

8 months for cost to be same, cost will be $408

Step-by-step explanation:

x = months

176 + 29x = 0 + 51x

176 = 22x

8 = x

176 + (29*8) = 408

0 + (51*8) = 408

3 0

3 years ago

Hrs

Furkat [3]

Answer:

10%

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

4 years ago