Answer:
The life in urban areas is fast and complicated, whereas rural life is simple and relaxed. The Urban settlement includes cities and towns. On the other hand, the rural settlement includes villages and hamlets. There is greater isolation from nature in urban areas, due to the existence of the built environment
Qin Shi Huangdhi was the king of the state of Qin, hence the title of Qin in front of his name. A big thing that he did was unify China in 221 BC after he conquered all of the other warring states in the China region. He brought peace and prosperity to China after that.
Hope this helps.
Answer: B. an import quota
Explanation:
An import quota is known to be a form of trade restriction which the government of a country imposes on a particular good from another country. The government place or put a limit on the number of imported goods which can be imported into the country over a specified period of time. Thus, the government imposes this in order to encourage local production of goods and services by making the prices of imported goods high and prices of local goods low.
How many syllables in alteration? 4 syllables
Divide alteration into syllables: al-ter-a-tion
Primary syllable stress: al-ter-a-tion
Secondary syllable stress: al-ter-a-tion
How to pronounce alteration: awl-ter-ey-shun
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
