1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anni [7]
3 years ago
7

Man, I really with I could be handsome.....

Law
2 answers:
saw5 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Everyone is beautiful

fiasKO [112]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

same

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How would you behave to alleviate the distress
alukav5142 [94]

Answer:

Identify your needs. ...

Focus on what you want — not on what you don't. ...

Honor your needs. ...

Get moving. ...

Develop a nurturing voice. ...

Reverse the “Golden Rule.” ...

Practice a soothing gesture. ...

Practice different perspectives.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Although a nolo contendere plea may lead to a judicial determination of guilt, it is inadmissible in later civil cases against t
Orlov [11]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

This statement correctly identifies a characteristic of the <em>nolo contendere</em> plea. This is a legal term that expresses the desire to not contend. Therefore, this is also known as a plea of no contest. This is considered a plea in which the defendant neither admits nor disputes a charge. This may lead to a determination of guilt, but it is inadmissible in later civil cases against the defendant based on the same conduct amounting to the criminal violation.

4 0
3 years ago
The four major speed laws are the basic speed law, prima favor speed law, the maximum speed law, and the _
BigorU [14]

Answer:

Minimum speed law

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose to Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and what Foundational American document did it help inspire?
Viefleur [7K]
It helped to convince loyalists to become patriots I’ll try to find the second answer
5 0
3 years ago
What is Katz argument?<br><br> What is the Katz v United States holding ?
gregori [183]
What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.




What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2
    13·1 answer
  • What is the word for approving an amendment​
    9·1 answer
  • When you approach an empty parking space,
    10·2 answers
  • Thank you to whoever is able to help me ​
    9·1 answer
  • What is the force called that resists motion between two surfaces that are in contact
    12·2 answers
  • Read these excerpts from Fever 1793 and The Summer of the Pestilence.
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a philosophical question?
    8·1 answer
  • What are 8 examples of behaviors that can lead to aggressive driving and the ways that you can avoid them?
    7·1 answer
  • In a similar previous case the court ruled for the plaintiff. The court will now consider that previous ruling in deciding how t
    9·1 answer
  • What drug has an increased risk of over dose when taken with alcohol
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!