1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aksik [14]
3 years ago
13

The Johnson family wants to start a college fund for their daughter Gabriella. They put $63, 000 into an account that grows at a

rate of 2.55% per year, compounded quarterly. Given the function G(t)= 63,000(1+ .0255/4)^ 4t, where G(t) represents the amount of money in the account t years after the account is opened, given that no more money is deposited into or withdrawn from the account.
Calculate the number of years it will take for the account to reach approximately $150,000, to the nearest hundredth of a year.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Rainbow [258]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

<em>It will take approximately 34.13 years</em>

Step-by-step explanation:

The function G(t) below represents the amount of money in some account t years after the account is opened for The Johnson's daughter Gabriella:

G(t)= 63,000(1+ .0255/4)^ {4t}

It's required to find the number of years (t) it will take for the account to reach G(t)=150,000. We need to solve the equation:

63,000(1+ .0255/4)^ {4t}=150,000

Dividing by 63,000 and simplifying:

\displaystyle (1+ .0255/4)^ {4t}=\frac{150,000}{63,000}=2.38095

Taking logarithms:

\displaystyle \log(1+ .0255/4)^ {4t}=\log 2.38095

Applying logarithms property:

\displaystyle (4t) \log(1+ .0255/4)=\log 2.38095

Solving for t:

\displaystyle 4t =\frac{\log 2.38095}{\log(1+ .0255/4)}

\displaystyle t =\frac{\log 2.38095}{4\log(1+ .0255/4)}

Calculating:

\displaystyle t =\frac{0.37675}{0.01104}

\boxed{t \approx 34.13}

It will take approximately 34.13 years

You might be interested in
The sum of two numbers is 3. Five times the larger number plus four times the smaller number is 29. Find the numbers
gulaghasi [49]
Let's have two numbers x (larger) and y (smaller). from the info above...

x + y = 3
5x + 4y = 29

so that means y=3 - x. we can sub this in
5x + 4(3-x) = 29
5x + 12 - 4x = 29
x = 17
then y=3-x=3-17=-14

so it's 17 and -14



7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Charlie saves $21.45 each month for 6 months.In the seventh month, he only saves $10.60.How much money will Charlie have after 7
Tomtit [17]
$21.45 x 6 = $128.7
$128.7 + $10.60 = $139.3

Charlie will have saved $139.3 in 7 months
8 0
3 years ago
What does a irrational number look like
julia-pushkina [17]

A irrational number is a number that can't be expressed as a ratio of two whole numbers. That's it.

For examples (in increasing order of difficulty)

1 is a rational number because it is 1/1

0.75 is a rational number because it is equal to 3/4

2.333... (infinite number of digits, all equal to three) is rational because it is equal to 7/3.

sqrt(2) is not a rational number. This is not completely trivial to show but there are some relatively simple proofs of this fact. It's been known since the greek.

pi is irrational. This is much more complicated and is a result from 19th century.

As you see, there is absolutely no mention of the digits in the definition or in the proofs I presented.

Now the result that you probably hear about and wanted to remember (slightly incorrectly) is that a number is rational if and only if its decimal expansion is eventually periodic. What does it mean ?

Take, 5/700 and write it in decimal expansion. It is 0.0057142857142857.. As you can see the pattern "571428" is repeating in the the digits. That's what it means to have an eventually periodic decimal expansion. The length of the pattern can be anything, but as long as there is a repeating pattern, the number is rational and vice versa.

As a consequence, sqrt(2) does not have a periodic decimal expansion. So it has an infinite number of digits but moreover, the digits do not form any easy repeating pattern.

5 0
2 years ago
Someone please hurry and help with the two I got wrong !!!!!!!
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

-2

35

Step-by-step explanation:

yeah-ya.........

right?

8 0
2 years ago
The sum of two numbers it 226. their differences is 200. what are the numbers?
jekas [21]
<span>To get the bigger number, divide by 2 the sum of the given sum of the numbers and their difference. In this case-
(226 + 200)/2 = 426/2 = 213.
To get the smaller number, divide by 2 the difference of the given sum of the numbers and their difference. In this case -
(226 - 200)/2 = 26/2 =13.
The two numbers are 213 and 13.
The bigger number is 213</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 20 multiplication facts in one minute. How long to take him to complete 35 multiplication facts
    11·1 answer
  • Please answer this correctly
    7·1 answer
  • Trig help ..............
    11·1 answer
  • Find the slope of the line passing through the points (3,-4) and (-6,9)
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP FIRST TO ANSWER CORRECTLY GETS BRAINLYIST
    15·1 answer
  • Plzzzzz help URGENT!!! will fail!!!! Need answer ASAP!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Jake practiced piano for 36 minutes. Betty practiced for 7 times as long as Jake. How many minutes did Betty​ practice? How many
    13·2 answers
  • Equal to, greater than, or less than?
    8·2 answers
  • In your own words, define the conic section you chose as a collection of points (loci) on a plane.
    6·1 answer
  • HELP ME OUT HERE 10 POINTS !
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!