Answer:
d
Step-by-step explanation:
because it's the same number
Answer:
2 years : $280
10 years: $1400
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is <u><em>7</em></u>!
Step-by-step explanation:
(x-4) (x) = 21, x^2 - 4x = 21, x^2 - 4x - 21 = 0, (x - 7) (x + 3) = 0, x = 7 and -3; x can't be negative so the answer is 7!
x = 7 and x - 4 (other side) = 3
Answer:
c. and Sagot po PA brainless po pleas
Answer:
h(8q²-2q) = 56q² -10q
k(2q²+3q) = 16q² +31q
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Replace x in the function definition with the function's argument, then simplify.
h(x) = 7x +4q
h(8q² -2q) = 7(8q² -2q) +4q = 56q² -14q +4q = 56q² -10q
__
2. Same as the first problem.
k(x) = 8x +7q
k(2q² +3q) = 8(2q² +3q) +7q = 16q² +24q +7q = 16q² +31q
_____
Comment on the problem
In each case, the function definition says the function is not a function of q; it is only a function of x. It is h(x), not h(x, q). Thus the "q" in the function definition should be considered to be a literal not to be affected by any value x may have. It could be considered another way to write z, for example. In that case, the function would evaluate to ...
h(8q² -2q) = 56q² -14q +4z
and replacing q with some value (say, 2) would give 196+4z, a value that still has z as a separate entity.
In short, I believe the offered answers are misleading with respect to how you would treat function definitions in the real world.
