Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
There was a valid consideration because an amount of money $10,000 was promised and clearly agreed between both parties Erin and Stephanie.
There is an enforceable contract because there was an offer and acceptance; mutual obligation and consideration, and the subject matter was not illegal.
Contracts must not be written to be enforceable. Erin and Stephanie's contract was oral and still enforceable. The question however will be if Erin is of age to be able to pay $10,000 otherwise the contract may not be enforceable or binding.
This scenario is traumatic to the victim on which his/her identity is being used by someone to process a transaction or involve in any activities that they harm others. This kind of crime is beneficial only to the person who stole the identity of other people where she/he can get money and other benefits out his/her committed crime.
Suppose in studying Climate Change we discover that in one country, deserts are going to be created where formerly there was grasslands and an abundance of water and in another place the coastlines are going to be altered. If you are an American, how do you think a politician is going to respond to such a problem.
Will his/her response be well thought out based on scientific preparedness, or will he (or she) grab onto the first solution suggestion to him/her and try and implement that?
Whatever he/she does, it will cost and everyone will be affected. A starting place is to find out what presidents in the past have done. During the Bush administration (the second Bush), there was an oil crisis. He responded by allocating more acreage to the growing of corn so supplementing oil production. Replaceable resources for non renewable ones. Sounded like a very good solution, but was it? As it turned out, no. He was robbing Peter to pay Paul. Thousands of people suffered (and died) with that decision because food is much more important than solving transportation problems at the expense of food.
The same is true here. If a solution is sought for global warming, politicians have to be well aware of what they are doing. And that has to be studied very carefully.
I’m not sure about this question. Try doing an image search of searching key terms
Answer:
Part a: The probability of breaking even in 6 tosses is 0.3125.
Part b: The probability that one payer wins all the money after the 10th toss is 0.0264.
Explanation:
Part a
P(success)=1/2=0.5
P(Failure)=1/2=0.5
Now for the break-even at the sixth toss
P(Break Even)=P(3 success out of 6)
P(3 success out of 6)
So the probability of breaking even in 6 tosses is 0.3125.
Part b:
So the probability that one of the player wins all the money after the 10th toss is given as the tenth toss is given as a win so
Wins in 9 tosses is given as 9!/7!=72
The probability that the other person wins
Wins in 8 out of 10 tosses is given as 10!/8!(10-8)!=10!/8!2!=45
So the probability of all the money is won by one of the gambler after the 10th toss is given as
P=number of wins in 9 tosses-Number of wins in 10 tosses/total number of tosses
P=(72-45)/2^16
P=0.0264
So the probability that one payer wins all the money after the 10th toss is 0.0264.
