<span>The process of gender role development. The development of gender roles implies recognizing the personal gender, being male or female (boy or girl), and the attributes or characteristics expected socially and culturally according to the gender, that is, what is the social role of a person according to his / her gender. <span>In this example, it is emphasized that from the distribution of household chores a distinction is made according to the gender: the child helping the father and the girl to the mother in traditionally male or female tasks.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
The experimental units are what you apply the treatments to. In this experiment it would be the subjects or the customers in this situation since they will be treatment (either standing at their regular height or squatting to meet the eye level which could affect the amount of tip they give). An example of randomization can be numbering each table in the restaurant and picking them out of a hat and going to that table that you randomly chose and imposing the treatment on the customers there. Because tips depend on the income of the customers and how much they are willing to give for their meal. If not even income some people are willing to give despite how much money they make so their tips may higher than the wealthy crowd. Other factors the experimenters may not be able to control is the mood of the customers as well isn't it more likely if someone is enjoying their time to give more to the server despite the service the waiter.
If you moved to Texas there was law that if you migrated farther to the west and you settled on that land for 5 years it was now your land.
Easy peasy-
d because that is the only thing that happened with america according to FDR's opinion
Answer:
Multiple causes took place that eventually caused many colonists to go against Great Britain.
Explanation:
By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, there were many causes that continued to pile up. Parliament had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists didn't like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war.
Most colonists disagreed. Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.