All categories

3 years ago

Heydhdhcjhcjkhcjhkhjckzhuisehzcwjkhzxuichslhcuihzuca

Mathematics

2 answers:

Hunter-Best [27]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

owduifbeiprnjviruvhneijwvbierubvjkrewn rfv

Step-by-step explanation:

pochemuha3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Have a proper question please-

Step-by-step explanation:

Did you know that

heydhdhcjhcjkhcjhkhjckzhuisehzcwjkhzxuichslhcuihzuca is

01101000 01100101 01111001 01100100 01101000 01100100 01101000 01100011 01101010 01101000 01100011 01101010 01101011 01101000 01100011 01101010 01101000 01101011 01101000 01101010 01100011 01101011 01111010 01101000 01110101 01101001 01110011 01100101 01101000 01111010 01100011 01110111 01101010 01101011 01101000 01111010 01111000 01110101 01101001 01100011 01101000 01110011 01101100 01101000 01100011 01110101 01101001 01101000 01111010 01110101 01100011 01100001

In binary? Thought I might as well make use of the free points.

You might be interested in

What is equivalent to five and 300

julia-pushkina [17]

X=120
2/5-(x/300)=0
Simplify= X/300
2/5-X/300=0
Simplify=2/5
2/5-X/300=0
The left denominater is: 5
The right denominater is: 300

6 0

3 years ago

HELP ME ASAP!!!!!!!!! Give explanation

8_murik_8 [283]

16 because when the line is on the x-axis, it is on zero

8 0

3 years ago

Which order pair could be a solution to this inequality

Tasya [4]

Answer:

(0,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given inequality is

y< x+ 4

to check the solution we plug in each ordered pair and check with our inequality

Lets check (-1,4)

here x=-1 and y =4

We plug in -1 for x and 4 for y in our inequality y<x+4

4 < -1 + 4

4 < 3 that is false, so (-1,4) is not our solution

Now we plug in (0,5), x=0 and y = 5

y < x+4

5 < 0 + 4

5<4 that is false, so (0,5) is not our solution

Now we plug in (0,3), x=0 and y = 3

y < x+4

3 < 0 + 4

3<4 that is true, so (0,3) is our solution

6 0

3 years ago

A student skipped a step when she tried to convert 18 hours into seconds,

gladu [14]

Answer:

The conversion of minutes to seconds is skipped in multiple-step conversion.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

To convert 18 hours into seconds.

Now, to get the conversion ratio skip in this multiple-step conversion.

First we need to convert hours into minutes:

1 hour = 60 minutes.

So, 18 hours = $18\times 60 minutes$

= $1080 minutes$ .

Then, we convert minutes into seconds:

1 minute = 60 seconds.

So, 1080 minutes = $1080\times 60 seconds$

= $64800 seconds$ .

Thus, 18 hours = 64800 seconds.

<u>As given in question the conversion from hours to seconds is there but the conversion of minutes to second is not there it is skipped so the result is incorrect.</u>

Therefore, the conversion of minutes to seconds is skipped in multiple-step conversion.

5 0

3 years ago

Please help it would be greatly appreciated:)

mixer [17]

Answer:

I really don't know but can u help with mine-_-

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers