Answer:
no enough evidence to draw up a conclusion
Step-by-step explanation:
Data:
let:
= decay after 2 weeks
= decay after 16 weeks
Making the hypotheses:
Null hypothesis; data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be8ae/be8aece1a6b76e6fdd8edeb85ae242e4e4e51e5c" alt="H_{o} = \mu _{1} - \mu _{2} = 0"
the deviation = 0.05
the standard difference = 4
Conditions:
The normal distribution curve can be plotted on a graph and the plot shows that the distribution is a skewed distribution.
Then,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e734/9e734f0179747f3ada340540e1fed62ce7fc5214" alt="t = \frac{(123.8-16.4)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{4.6^{2} }{5}+\frac{16.09^{2} }{5} } } \\ = 0.989"
Therefore, it can be concluded that 0.1983 > 0.05. This presents our failure to reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to conclude that polyester decays more in less than 2 weeks.
Answer:
7/15
Step-by-step explanation:
You have 120 bags. 64 of them in total do not contain buttons.
120 - 64 = 56
You have 56 bags with buttons. The simple answer is,
56/120
You can simplify this down to 7/15
If you're looking for percent, the answer is 46.67%
since the 5 is a negative you are actually subtracting it from 3
so 3 +(-5) is actually 3-5. which = -2
Answer:
The answer is B
Step-by-step explanation:
B