Answer:
it's pray hoped this helped
The force acting on his feet.
Answer:
3.39 mins.
10m/s multiplied by 6 equals to 60 seconds or 1 minute
Answer:
Acceleration is percieved, not constant velocity.
Explanation:
You are most aware when the vehicle is accelerating. At constant velocity you would not be aware of the motion. Only if the system is accelerated the dynamics must be solved considering a pseudo-force (of inertial origin) acting.
It's because of this that:
(A) False. The acceleration can be detected from the inside of a closed car.
(B) False. You would be aware of the motion, but not because humans can sense speed but acceleration.
(C) False. Constant velocity cannot be felt in a closed car.
(D) False. Again, you can't feel constant speed.
Answer:
A: used has four times the tensile strength of steel and the timber frame, incorporating
Explanation:
Option A is correct because it conveys the correct message intended by the statement and has no grammatical errors.
Option B is wrong because to say "has four times the tensile strength of steel has" is just grammatically and idiomatically wrong as has is used twice in the sentence.
Option C is wrong because the statement that has to do with the flexibility of the timber's frame is more like a separate fact and does not fall under the scope of trying to further explain a fact.
Option D is wrong because it has the same problem in Option C. The comma that is placed after "steel" breaks the sentence and hence does not provide a good understanding of why the building can withstand earthquakes.
Option E is grammatically wrong for using does in the sentence "has four times the tensile strength steel does"