the one that makes the most sense to me is C. sorry if im wrong
It would be more difficult for a researcher to establish rapport with an informant they have not met.
Informants are very important in research because they help the researcher to find out things that would have been otherwise difficult to find.
Researchers generally prefer to meet their informants in person because:
- they can better read non-verbal cues such as hand gestures
- there is a chance for a better connection with the informant
- easier to establish credibility
All of these ensure that the researcher is able to establish rapport easier with the informant so meeting in person is better.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/12187291.</em>
<span>She was one of the first to advocate for school nursing (choice B). Through this concept, having nurses on hand to help the students should they become ill, she was able to assure that students were attending school and not experiencing chronic absenteeism.</span>
Answer:
O Lung cancer mortality rates among heavy smokers.
Explanation:
This question refers to Bradford Hill's criteria for causation. These are nine principles that Bradford Hill developed in order to allow researchers in epidemiology establish evidence of a causal relationship between a presumed cause and an observed effect. This criteria has been widely used in research. The criterion of strength, or effect size, indicates that a small association does not mean that there is not a causal effect, though the larger the association, the more likely that it is causal. As the association between lung cancer mortality rates and heavy smoking is quite high, this is likely to be a causal relationship.
