Answer:
I just googled, it has to be something to confirm your identity, so it can be anything
Explanation:
Google
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is not Title VIII of the 1972 Education Act that prohibits gender discrimination in all primary and secondary schools, colleges and universities that receive federal funds. Title IX determines this.
This title aims to promote gender equality throughout the country's education sector, allowing girls and boys to have the same chances and the same privileges in all phases of academic growth, not allowing one gender to be valued above the other.
Answer:
Yes!
Explanation:
You can sue anybody for anything as long as the judge accepts it.
The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.
Answer:
not me seriously not me, btw like how your posting fun contents ^_^
